Our Mutual Fund Recommendations

Go to the main Asset Allocation page

Recommended mutual funds for investment portfolio management.

Site Information

Read About the Current Sale!

Confused? It Makes Sense If You Start at the Home Page

Why We're Better

Pricing and How to Buy the Mutual Fund Recommendations Are at the Bottom

Product List and Prices

Discounts for Financial Planners and Money Managers

Buy the Selected Mutual Funds Now

How to Buy Software in General

Site Map


Site Info, History, Ordering Security, Privacy, FAQs

Questions About Mutual Fund Recommendations? Call (800) 658-1824 This is NOT Morningstar or Principia's phone number

About Getting Investment Software Approved by Broker Dealers and FINRA

Financial Plan Software Support

Financial Plan Integration

About Portfolio Management Software

About Using Monte Carlo with Investment Software

Testimonials from Financial Planning Software Customers

 

Buy the Selected Mutual Funds Now

Free Downloads and Money Tools

Free Sample Comprehensive Financial Plan

Free Downloads, Investing Tips, and Tutorials

Financial Plan Module Demos

Links to Other Personal Finance Websites

The World's Best Free Retirement Calculator

Other Free Retirement Calculators

Free Bond Yield Calculator

Our Free Financial Calculators

Other Free Online Financial Calculators

Free Family Money Calculators

Free Real Estate Calculators

Free Debt Calculators

Free Investment Calculators

Free Tax Calculators

Free College Calculators

Free Insurance Calculators

Free Business Owner Calculators



Buy the Selected Mutual Funds Now

Mutual Fund Screening, Recommendations, Analysis, General Information, and Tips

This website is not affiliated with Morningstar or Principia

Mutual funds are one of humanities greatest inventions. For individual investors, they are by far the best way to invest. If you know how to avoid the bad ones:

· There's a fund that specializes in most everything investors want,
· they're efficient,
· easy to invest in,
· easy to sell and you can withdraw small odd dollar amounts anytime,
· are inexpensive,
· it doesn't cost a lot to get started, nor to add new investments,
· they disclose everything and give you all of the information you need,
· are highly regulated,
· usually behave as they're supposed to,
· they lower risk by providing diversification by owning many securities,
· one can invest in most of them without paying a financial advisor,
· and they allow you to make money while not wasting resources on the futile tasks of timing markets and picking stocks.

We offer a spreadsheet with 93 mutual fund picks for investors and financial advisors. It shows the history going back to 2002, and each switch is explained.

There is a mutual fund recommendation for each of the 21 asset classes we work with, times five ways of managing money: Fee-based (21), all load mutual funds (21), all no-load mutual funds (21), all index funds (11), and all ETFs (19).

We only screen open-end mutual funds, ETFs, and Index funds. There are no funds with back-end redemption fees (B shares) or closed-end funds.

If you can't buy a fund selection in your investment account, then you can get a replacement if you buy support.

You can get the mutual fund picks separately, or they come with both the model portfolios and asset allocation software. You can buy them just once or subscribe for one year. They're updated monthly, and are usually e-mailed the third week of the month.

Mutual Fund Selections for Advisors

The fee-based fund picks are for advisors that can buy loaded funds (A shares) at NAV in managed accounts. In other words, the front-end loads are waived so investors don't pay them. Advisors then charge their clients fees as a percentage of assets under management.

Fee-only advisors without access to fee-based platforms can use the no-load fund picks or index funds. Advisors working on a commission-basis can use the load fund picks or ETFs.

Forget about wasting time trying to choose mutual funds. You need to spend your time managing relationships and building your business. Even if you spent an hour a day at it, the results would still not even be close to our performance.

Most planners would be able to get a new client every week with the time they saved by not having to baby-sit mutual funds. So for hardly any money, you get both better fund picks and more time to focus on what's really important. Plus you'll make more money if you get paid via fees or 12b-1 fees, because the more your clients' assets grow, the more money you'll make.

You can also forget about taking bad advice from people full of conflicts of interest peddling their fund picks (your BD and their research departments, fund wholesalers, software vendors, fellow advisors, the media, and generic advertising). All they care about is making more money from you. Just compare their recommendations to how well our picks have performed below, and you'll see that you can easily get better performance for your clients by having a true expert pick them. We are totally free of conflicts of interest and all we care about is performance for our customers.

These mutual fund selections allow you to easily stop doing business the 20th century way. Everyone will be better off if you just broke the old habit of using American Funds (click to read why that doesn't work anymore).

Financial professionals don't need a FINRA Series 7 license to manage money for clients using our investment software with mutual funds. A Series 6 is all that's required.

Advisors can use the mutual fund picks to justify trading to compliance, because it has reasons for switches. Once they see what you're doing, they'll leave you alone, because compliance prefers low-turnover asset allocation using mutual funds.

On average, one mutual fund changes per month, so you won't get unwanted attention about churning to drum up commissions. Once they see you're fact finding correctly to determine investment risk tolerance, and maybe even using an IPS, they'll leave you alone.

So not only will this save you time, money, and work, once you start getting better returns with lower risk, you'll be on everyone's good side.

About Screening Mutual Funds

Morningstar Principia investment database software is used in the first phase of mutual fund screening.

Screening mutual funds is similar to using a strainer to let small stuff get through, while blocking big stuff. One can tell the strainer to stop mutual funds with certain characteristics, letting only ones without them get through.

For example, if you tell it to show only Large-Cap Growth mutual funds, it will let 1,900 of the 25,500 funds get through. Then with our screens, less than ten of the 1,900 make it through. These are the candidates for further screening. Only one of the ten will end up being the current pick.

Once the initial screening process is complete, getting information Morningstar doesn’t have, is inept at getting, or is outdated further refines it. So we may do more in-depth screening, like calling the fund to get fresh data, and reading internet articles. In case you didn't know, Morningstar does a bad job at maintaining basic, accurate, or fresh data. In 2006 and 2007, about 7% of their monthly returns were wrong, and not fixed until Feb '08.

The asset class purity test is the best way to weed out undesirable characteristics in each asset class. Then performance testing over several time frames compares mutual funds against their benchmark. Then several other tests are run to make sure there isn't a rookie manager, the market cap is right, too much is not held overseas, etc.

There is no market timing involved in screening mutual funds, so where the markets are, and are expected to be, have zero influence.

If you've read other pages of this site, then you may be thinking we're hypocrites, because screening mutual funds is a form of "security selection" and we don't recommend that. It is, but it's within an asset allocation framework. We don't do the hard work, which is the actual security selection (stock picking) and market timing. The fund managers do this. They're the only ones with sufficient resources to succeed at these futile tasks. We don't, your firm doesn't, your BD and their research department doesn't, no TV show, magazine, newspaper, or website does, and you don't; so why keep beating that dead horse?

What we're doing is "managing managers." When all of the mutual funds are combined to form an investment portfolio, it's called a Model Portfolio. These asset allocation models are also known as "Funds of Funds."

Our screening process is not out to find the mutual fund that will "go up" the most. They are picked to best represent each of the asset classes over the next year or two. The goal is to find the mutual fund that's purest to the asset class, will beat the benchmark index, and will behave most like the asset class. This gives it the highest probability of going down less when the asset class goes down, and up more when it goes up.

Mutual fund selection is like trying to herd cats, because "misbehaving" is just their nature. This is mostly because of pressure from their marketing people to do things that will make the fund family the most short-term money. This is to the detriment of fund performance, long-term income, and shareholders' best interests. Mutual fund family managers (not the mutual fund managers) will most always choose to screw up a good mutual fund if they think they can make more money somehow. So diligent analysis is part of a constant baby-sitting job.

As you can see on the table of historical returns below and on the asset allocation tutorial page, our screening process enables one to usually get better performance than buying index funds. So the argument that passive investing beats active management after fees is proven false more than 90% of the time. See for yourself by doing the math. Count how many times the index beat the fund in all time frames one year or longer (ignore monthly and YTD as this is too short half of the year). Out of 84 data points, the index beats the fund only between five and ten times on average.

This screening process adds value because active mutual fund picks are able to outperform their benchmarks for a year or two. After that, most don't and are replaced. Screening closed-end funds has no predictive ability because the premiums and discounts are too random due to thin trading.

A fund rarely lasts more than a couple years before it gets messed up, or a better one comes along. Oppenhiemer Real Asset held the record, as being the Tangibles pick for over six years. Then it strayed from the initial objective, underperformed, and then closed to new investors. So even the best mutual fund families misbehave given enough time.

Morningstar's summary mutual fund ranking system (the number of Stars a fund has earned), is not used in our screening process. This system is too flawed, and in our opinion, has no value in the Real World.

It seems like they recommend funds and fund managers they personally like, have caught the attention of the press, are famous just for being famous, and more than likely are getting kickback money from. They say there's a formula for earning stars, but some funds don't add up. They also keep touting the same old laggards in the press year after year (like American Funds). So there's more going on than great analytical work when Morningstar recommends a mutual fund.

Most of our mutual fund picks have a lot of Morningstar Stars, but very few with the full set of stars pass our screens. Over time we've also seen many funds with the full set of stars underperform when compared against its proper benchmark index. Free tip - just ignore Morningstar Star ratings.

Sorry, but we don't sell the actual Morningstar mcr screening files anymore. Our methodology is a trade secret, and all we're going to say is already on this page.

Please note that our mutual fund screening process does not look into when capital gains distributions occur.

If you buy a mutual fund in a non-tax-qualified account today, and there's a distribution tomorrow, you pay tax on it and get no benefit (other than the increase in basis). This is because the value of the shares will fall by the same amount as the distribution.

So before buying a fund in a non-tax-qualified account, you should call and ask when they expect this to happen (usually late fall), so you can wait until after distributions occur.

In Addition to these Mutual Fund Selections, there's Also a Personalized Screening Service

You can get a unique perspective on any open-end mutual fund for $20 each.

Find mutual funds yourself that fit your goals with no conflicts of interest. This way nobody is steering you toward a mutual fund, or mutual fund family, because they'll make money.

Then send the mutual fund family name and the mutual fund name (or just the ticker symbol) of each fund you want an opinion on.

We'll first see if there are problems finding data. If we can analyze it, then we'll total up your price, and instruct you how to pay.

This is a fee-only deal, so we have no affiliation with any Broker Dealer, life insurance company, or mutual fund family. We don't make any money other than the research fee. This means you'll get unbiased opinions because there are no conflicts of interest.

What You'll Be Told About Each Mutual Fund:

· What asset class the mutual fund really fits into, and not what the mutual fund family or anyone else's hype says.

· How the fund stands up to others in its correct peer group, both by Prospectus Objective and Morningstar Category, over several time frames.

· What mutual fund we currently recommend in that asset class.

· Why the fund doesn't pass our screening process.

· If it's an oddball asset class we don't track, then you'll get one recommendation of a better similar mutual fund.

· An overall opinion of the fund, and if you should own it or not. If so, how much is too much.

· An opinion on why it was recommended by a financial advisor.

Miscellaneous

Individual investors can use free investment portfolio services from Yahoo and Google to evaluate mutual fund performance. You can input a basket of mutual funds, and it will calculate historical performance of the portfolio. They do a better job of backtesting returns than most discount brokers.

So this can be used as a resource for finding mutual fund returns over various time frames without having to spend money on Morningstar or having to call each individual fund company.

American Funds investors, and investment advisors that sell them, should read this page.

You can hire us to pick mutual funds/subaccounts and build custom portfolios that perform better from limited investment choices in variable annuities, life insurance contracts, and 401(k) plans.

Why aren't you taking advantage of this? Send e-mail and if you have an interesting reason, then you may get a freebie.

Product Information

Fully Integrated Financial Planning Software
 

Menu of Retirement Planning Software


Asset Allocation Overview with Our Historical Returns


Asset Allocation Software


Asset Allocation Models with Our Historical Returns


Financial Plan Tools


Family Budgeting Calculator


Financial Planning Fact Finders


Investment Policy Statement Software


Bond Calculators


Investment Software for Comparing 23 Methods of Investing


Buy Term Life Insurance and Invest the Difference in Mutual Funds vs. Whole Life Insurance Calculator


Life Insurance Calculator


Real Estate Software


Net Worth Calculator


College Planning Software


Financial Planning eBook


Financial Planning Seminar


Minimum Required Distribution Calculators


About Investment Risk Tolerance


Contents of a New Fee-Based Prospect Binder


Variable Annuity Tutorial

Services

Fee-only Financial Planning and Investment Consulting for Consumers, Investors, and Financial Planners

Building Custom Investment Benchmark Portfolios

Financial Planner Directory

How to Become Your Own RIA

Coaching for Financial Planners

Asset Allocation for 401(k) / 403(b) and Similar Retirement Plans

 

 

 


Buy now with your Visa or MasterCard by calling (800) 658-1824

Buy now using the secure credit card ordering form

Buy now using PayPal and get 5% off

Mutual Fund Pick Prices

Unsupported

E-mail Support

E-mail and Phone Support

One-Time Mutual Fund Picks

$9

$19

$29

One Year of Monthly-Updated Mutual Fund Recommendations

$99 $119 $129

The Table Below Shows the Format of the Spreadsheet

It's color-coded to match up with the asset allocation software

Asset Class Fee-Based Mutual Fund Picks No-Load Mutual Fund Picks Front-End Load Mutual Fund Picks ETF Fund Picks Index Fund Picks
Short-Term U.S. Bond          
Intermediate-Term/Long-term U.S. Bond          
Multisector Bond          
Short-Term Muni Bond          
Intermediate-Term/Long-Term Muni Bond          
High-Yield (junk) Bond          
Int'l (not global) Bond          
Emerging Markets Bond          
Large-Cap Value          
Large-Cap Growth          
All/Mid-Cap          
Small-Cap          
Micro-Cap          
Technology          
Biotech/Health Care          
Internet          
Int'l All-Cap          
Int'l Small-Cap          
Emerging Markets          
Real Estate          
Tangibles          

Here Are the Results

 
Asset Class / Investment Vehicle Used Below Month of June '08 YTD (31 Dec '07 to 30 June '08) Last 12 Months Last 3 Years Annualized Average Last 5 Years Annualized Average Annualized Average Since Inception of 12/31/98
Fee-Based Moderate Asset Allocation Model Hypothetical, as shown in the demo (which has returns and yields for all 56 models). Investment returns are not linked to account for past mutual fund switches. Returns shown are after 1.1% management fees that you would charge your clients -2.44% 1.50% 9.41% 14.31% N/A - Some current recommended mutual funds don't have a five-year track record N/A - Some current mutual fund selections don't go back that far
Fee-Based Moderate Asset Allocation Model Actual, with investment returns linked to account for past mutual fund changes, rebalancings, 1.1% management fees that you would charge your clients, and everything FINRA needed to pass compliance -1.67% -3.31% 4.59% 13.62% 14.12% 9.81%
Moderate Index Asset Allocation Model
Same portfolio model as above, but funded with Indices. The difference is the value of active management - or mutual fund screening. No past Index Fund switches to account for. After 1.1% annual management fees that you would charge your clients
-2.91% -2.98% -2.01% 6.35% 8.83% 5.51%
Difference between the Actual Fee-Based Moderate Model and the Same Portfolio Model Funded with Indices
This is the correct apples-to-apples method of comparing portfolios, and shows the value of active vs. passive investment management from the mutual fund selections
+1.24% (or 42.6% better) -0.33% +6.60% (or 328.4% better) +7.27% (or 114.5% better) +5.29% (or 59.9% better) +4.30% (or 78.0% better)
SEI GoalLink Moderate Strategy Fund A (All SEI & DFA values assume to have the same 1.1% annual investment management fees deducted) -3.67% -6.06% -8.66% 2.67% N/A N/A
SEI GoalLink Tax-Managed Moderate Strategy Model -3.71% -4.06% -4.94% 3.35% N/A N/A
SEI GoalLink Moderate Strategy Allocation Fund "A" -6.34% -7.80% -10.84% 4.66% N/A N/A
SEI Private Client Moderate Model -3.78% -6.02% -8.77% 2.61% N/A N/A
SEI Tax-Managed Private Client Moderate Model -3.86% -3.82% -4.69% 3.47% N/A N/A
SEI Asset Allocation Model: Moderate Growth & Income -4.15% -6.10% -5.55% 3.51% 5.74% N/A
DFA Global 60/40 I Portfolio (their Best-fitting Moderate portfolio) -5.42% -6.48% -8.47% 4.92% N/A N/A
All American Funds Moderate Model
Hypothetical, and after 1.1% annual management fees that you would charge your clients
-3.41% -4.78% -3.23% 3.78% 5.26% 4.32%
Difference between our Hypothetical Fee-Based Moderate Model and the American Funds Moderate Model. The five year and 1/99 returns are from our Actual returns. +1.74% or 51.0% better 1.47% or 30.1% better +7.82% or 242.1% better +9.84% or 260.3% better +8.86% or 168.44% better +5.49% or 127.1% better
Market Indices Month of June '08 YTD (31 Dec '07 to 30 June '08) Last 12 Months Last 3 Years Annualized Average Last 5 Years Annualized Average Annualized Average Since Inception of 12/31/98
DJIA -10.04% -13.38% -13.27% 5.83% 7.20% 4.37%
S&P 500 -8.43% -11.81% -13.12% 4.41% 7.56% 2.08%
NASDAQ -9.11% -13.55% -11.82% 3.69% 7.16% 0.47%
Russell 2000 -7.70% -9.37% -16.19% 3.79% 10.29% 6.65%
MSCI EAFE NR USD -8.18% -10.96% -10.61% 12.84% 16.67% 5.77%
Lehman Bros. Aggregate Bond Index -0.08% 1.13% 7.12% 4.09% 3.85% 5.49%
Difference Between the Actual Fee-Based Moderate Model and the S&P 500
 
NO 1.1% ANNUAL FEES are subtracted from the S&P500 here, like they are in the Actual Moderate Model. This is not a proper comparison, like what's shown above with the Index Model, but this is what people actually do in the Real World
+6.76% (or 80.2% better) +8.50% (or 75.6% better) +17.71% (or 135.0% better) +9.21% (or 208.8% better) +6.56% (or 86.8% better) +7.73% (or 371.2% better)
Asset Classes and Mutual Funds Actual recommended mutual fund returns are the current mutual funds picks, which may not have been used in past time frames Month of June '08 YTD (31 Dec '07 to 30 June '08) Last 12 Months Last 3 Years Annualized Average Last 5 Years Annualized Average Annualized Average Since Inception of 12/31/98
Short-Term U.S. Bond Index (Lehman 1-3 Yr.) 0.24% 2.11% 7.07% 4.70% 3.32% 4.58%
Short-Term U.S. Bond Mutual Fund Pick 0.22% 1.91% 7.25% 4.51% 3.31% 4.76%
Intermediate-Term/Long-term U.S. Bond Index (Lehman Aggregate Bond) -0.08% 1.13% 7.12% 4.09% 3.86% 5.49%
Intermediate-Term/Long-term U.S. Bond Mutual Fund Pick 0.29% 2.03% 9.77% 4.62% 3.45% 4.75%
Multisector Bond Index (Lehman Aggregate Bond Index) -0.08% 1.13% 7.12% 4.09% 3.86% 5.49%
Multisector Bond Mutual Fund Pick -1.39% 1.30% 6.08% 6.67% 8.02% 7.24%
Short-Term Muni Bond Index (Lehman 2-4-Yr. Muni) -0.66% 1.80% 5.58% 3.42% 2.68% 3.84%
Short-Term Muni Bond Mutual Fund Pick -0.32% 1.80% 2.76% 4.44% 4.36% 3.94%
Intermediate-Term/Long-Term Muni Bond Index (Lehman Muni) -1.13% 0.02% 3.23% 2.93% 3.53% 4.76%
Intermediate-Term/Long-Term Muni Bond Mutual Fund Pick -1.20% 1.97% 5.11% 4.98% 4.69% 4.61%
High-Yield (junk) Bond Index (CSFB Credit Suisse High-Yield) -2.41% -1.14% -2.12% 4.85% 7.24% 6.24%
High-Yield (junk) Bond Mutual Fund Pick -1.99% 0.60% 0.39% 5.47% 7.13% 4.16%
Int'l (not global) Bond Index (Citi WGBI Non-USD Bond) 0.36% 5.70 18.72% 6.65% 7.06% 5.44%
Int'l Bond Mutual Fund Pick 0.83% 6.56% 15.27% 10.50% 7.83% N/A
Emerging Markets Bond (Citii ESBI Capped Brady) -5.54% -17.68% -12.03% -0.14% 5.20% 8.86%
Emerging Markets Bond Fund Pick -1.81% 0.12% 4.51% 7.81% 9.98% 14.44%
Large-Cap Value Index (Russell 1000 Value) -9.57% -13.57% -18.78% 3.53% 8.92% 4.84%
Large-Cap Value Mutual Fund Pick -6.46% -4.79% -2.83% 10.34% 13.83% 7.17%
Large-Cap Growth Index (Russell 1000 Growth) -7.20% -9.06% -5.96% 5.91% 7.32% -0.49%
Large-Cap Growth Mutual Fund Pick 1.80% 6.41% 21.52% 20.14% 16.41% 8.46%
  Month of June '08 YTD (31 Dec '07 to 30 June '08) Last 12 Months Last 3 Years Annualized Average Last 5 Years Annualized Average Annualized Average Since Inception of 12/31/98
All/Mid-Cap Index (Russell Mid-Cap) -8.00% -7.57% -11.19% 6.84% 13.07% 8.45%
All/Mid-Cap Mutual Fund Pick 1.93% -2.69% 16.42% 18.65% 18.75% 10.04%
Small-Cap Index (Russell 2000) -7.70% -9.37% -16.19% 3.79% 10.29% 6.65%
Small-Cap Mutual Fund Pick -3.53% 7.90% -1.41% 14.53% 19.97% N/A
Micro-Cap Index (Bridgeway Ultra-Small Company) -7.48% -13.78% -21.72% -0.28% 9.18% 14.14%
Micro-Cap Mutual Fund Pick -5.00% -6.93% -9.53% 12.02% 15.15% 13.73%
E*TRADE Technology Index -9.63% -12.57% -7.43% 6.40% 7.53% N/A
Technology Mutual Fund Pick -4.86% -5.90% 3.26% 11.57% 14.70% 11.25%
Biotech/Health Care Index (DJ Healthcare) -4.46% -11.96% -9.92% 1.86% 4.06% 2.46%
Biotech/Health Care Mutual Fund Pick -4.47% -2.88% -0.56% 11.42% 7.38% N/A
Internet Index (Morningstar Information Superhighway) -9.76% -14.13% -13.14% 5.03% 6.28% -2.66%
Internet Mutual Fund Pick -12.16% -14.93% -12.43% 5.07% 7.06% -3.05%
Int'l All-Cap Index (MSCI EAFE NR USD) -8.18% -10.96% -10.61% 12.84% 16.67% 5.77%
Int'l All-Cap Mutual Fund Pick -6.00% -5.73% 4.98% 25.99% 24.92% N/A
Int'l Small-Cap Index (MSCI EAFE Small-Cap NR USD) -8.23% -10.48% -18.64% 9.36% 18.89% N/A
Int'l Small-Cap Mutual Fund Pick -6.70% -9.57% -18.61% 15.50% 20.15% 12.57%
Emerging Markets Index (MSCI EM USD) -10.16% -12.72% 2.59% 24.37% 26.72% 14.59%
Emerging Markets Mutual Fund Pick -10.09% -12.46% 6.63% 30.24% 31.75% 20.08%
Real Estate Index (FTSE NAREIT Equity REITs) -10.88% -3.60% -13.64% 4.99% 14.30% 12.90%
Real Estate Mutual Fund Pick -4.13% 4.32% 22.27% 28.10% 33.09% 25.29%
Tangibles Index (Goldman Sachs Commodity Index) 9.22% 41.42% 75.98% 19.74% 21.30% 19.36%
Tangibles Mutual Fund Pick 12.52% 45.83% 67.68% 38.54% 44.42% 34.16%
  Month of June '08 YTD (31 Dec '07 to 30 June '08) Last 12 Months Last 3 Years Annualized Average Last 5 Years Annualized Average Annualized Average Since Inception of 12/31/98

 

 

Mutual Fund Turnover and Tax-Efficiency

The mutual fund turnover ratio gauges the average level of trading activity over a one-year time horizon. It's a measure of how often holdings were sold off, and new investments purchased with the proceeds. In other words, it's the percentage of the portfolio that has been replaced in the past year.

It's a ratio, so if a mutual fund has 100% turnover, the actual percentage of the portfolio traded was much less than 100%.

A fund that sold the equivalent of all of its assets, would have a turnover ratio of about 500%. If it sold a quarter of its assets four times, then it would have a ratio of 100%; even though 75% of the holdings may never have been traded. A fund would have a ratio of 0% if it sold 10% of its holdings, and then 10% of the fund's worth of new money came in and was invested.

The formula is:

(Whichever is less: Assets Sold Off - or - New Investment Purchases) / (Net Assets - 12 month average) = Mutual Fund Turnover Ratio

About the only things one can generalize are: The higher the trading activity, the higher the trading expense, which you pay in management fees. This also means higher capital gains taxes, and probably higher dividend distributions. This matters more in personal/non-tax-qualified accounts than in tax-qualified accounts.

The higher the ratio, the less time they're holding securities before they sell them. A lower ratio would indicate a longer-term "buy and hold" investment strategy.

The higher the ratio, the more the managers are making short-term trades, which could mean an over-emphasis on market timing techniques (which is usually bad).

Also, these ratios change frequently and are not stable. If a fund was holding Microsoft since the '80's until it got to certain level, and then the plan was to sell it all, then a fund with a low turnover ratio for a long time would suddenly have a very high ratio.

A sudden change in turnover ratio may indicate the fund had a big change of some kind - in managers, style, or emphasis on asset allocation / market timing / stock picking / security selection / use of derivatives / etc.

Some investors put this ratio into their screens to see if the fund changed its strategy. We don't because we feel the numbers are too volatile to mean anything. If a ratio that was too high or low was hurting return performance, then it wouldn't pass the screens in the first place.

Bond funds will have low ratios and small-cap equity funds will have high ratios.

The desired ratio depends on what type it is, why you'd want to own it, and other factors, like investment risk tolerance.

One would need to compare a fund's ratio to a basket comprised of similar mutual funds to see if it's out of line compared to the average.